Peer review

All manuscripts submitted to the editorial office of the journal "Pedagogical Bulletin of Kazakhstan" are subjected to mandatory blind review. Based on the reviews received, the editorial board of the journal makes the final decision. The order of consideration of articles:  

  1. To apply for the publication of an article you need to go to the journal`s website https://pedvestnik.ppu.edu.kz/ and register. Fill in the text fields. Attach the file of the article in .doc / .docx format (MS Word), the file of the payment receipt, sign the public offer - an agreement on the independent nature of the submitted manuscript, agreement to check the article for plagiarism and grant exclusive rights to the publisher. Check the completed data and click the "Send" button.
  2. The manuscript sent by the author is received by the editorial office of the journal. The responsible secretary checks the manuscript for compliance with technical requirements.
  3. The Journal Manager checks the manuscript for self-authorship through the automatic plagiarism check system. According to the results of the automatic plagiarism check of the manuscript, the full report on the check is uploaded. If a low percentage of originality - below the established threshold - is detected, the article is not accepted for consideration for publication in the journal.
  4. Next, the journal manager sends the article to the editor-in-chief. The Editor-in-Chief reviews the article for compliance with the subject of the journal. In case of non-compliance, the editorial office sends a letter to the author with a justification for refusal of publication. On average, the initial review of an article takes 10 days.
  5. Next, the Editor-in-Chief identifies reviewers, for each article that passed the initial screening.
  6. Further, the responsible secretary sends the manuscript with the full report on plagiarism check to the reviewers in order to determine the possibility of publishing the article in the journal.
  7. The journal uses a double-blind reviewing procedure, in which the editorial board does not disclose the names of reviewers. Reviewers provide the editorial office of the journal with reasonable reviews of the article, including the relevance of the topic under study, the author`s contribution to the scientific field, the level of results obtained. All reviews contain a recommendation to publish the article (with or without revisions) or to refuse publication. All reviews are received by the Editorial Board of the Journal.
  8. Further, the executive secretary sends reviews to the editor-in-chief.
  9. In case of receipt of reviews for revision with the consent of the Editor-in-Chief, the responsible secretary sends the review of the article to the author with the note "to revise the article according to the reviewer`s comments". In this case, the author should submit the corrected version of the article within two weeks.
  10. All materials on the article (reviews, report on plagiarism) are submitted to the meeting of the editorial board. The decision on the possibility of publishing an article in the journal is made by the editorial board of the journal based on the reviews of the reviewers. Articles that have received a negative review are not accepted for re-consideration. On average, the decision to publish is made within 8 weeks.
  11. All reviews and the decision on the article are sent to the author who submitted the article by the editorial board. Publication is carried out in the order of the general queue as soon as the material is ready. The editors have the right to form a queue in accordance with the headings of upcoming issues.